Income Inequality and Pro-Poor Opinions: Empirical Evidence at Regional Level

Authors

  • Leonardo Becchetti University of Tor Vergata in Rome
  • Giovanni Cerase University of Tor Vergata in Rome
  • Nazaria Solferino Universitas Mercatorum

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25071/1874-6322.40642

Keywords:

regional inequality, pro-poor opinions, inequity aversion, welfare preferences., Gini index

Abstract

This study examines how exposure to regional inequality can be related to fairness beliefs about the poor. The hypothesis is that greater inequality is associated with a greater awareness of social disparities, resulting in a higher consensus on the necessity of helping society’s left behind. Using data from the European Social Survey across multiple regions in 25 countries, our results show a significant positive relationship between regional inequality and support for social care targeting the most disadvantaged. We find some evidence of the effect being particularly concentrated among higher income and more educated individuals. Our main findings remain robust
across multiple specifications. The research contributes to the literature by highlighting how actual inequality may shape normative beliefs about social fairness, moving beyond traditional redistribution preferences.

References

Alesina, A., and Angeletos, M. (2003). Fairness and redistribution: US versus Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Harvard University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w9502

Alesina, A., and Giuliano, P. (2011). Preferences for redistribution. In Handbook of social economics (Vol. 1, pp. 93–131). North-Holland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53187-2.00004-8

Alesina, A., Glaeser, E., Sacerdote, B. (2001). Why doesnt the US have a European-type welfare state? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 187–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2001.0014

Alston, J. P., Imogene Dean, K. (1972). Socioeconomic factors associated with attitudes toward welfare recipients and the causes of poverty. Social Service Review, 46(1), 13–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/642795

Andress, H.-J., Heien, T. (2001). Four worlds of welfare state attitudes? A Comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States. European Sociological Review, 17(4), 337–356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/17.4.337

Atkinson, A. B. (2015), Inequality. What can be done?, Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674287013

Batson, C. D., Early, S., and Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 23(7), 75–758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297237008

Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N., and Tsang, J.-A. (2007). Four motives for community involvement. Journal of Social Issues, 63(3), 429–445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00269

Becchetti, L., Colcerasa, F., Peragine, V., and Pisani, F. (2024). Inequality of opportunity and life satisfaction. Oxford Economic Papers, gpae011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpae011

Benson, R., Duffy, B., Hesketh, R., Hewlett, K. (2024). Attitudes to inequalities. Oxford Open Economics, 3(Supplement_1), i39–i63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ooec/odad069

Black, D. (1948). On the rationale of group decision-making. Journal of Political Economy, 56(1), 23–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/256633

Bradley, C., Cole, D. J. (2002). Causal attributions and the significance of self-efficacy in predicting solutions to poverty. Sociological Focus, 35(4), 381–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2002.10570710

Brekke, K. A., Kverndokk, S., and Nyborg, K. (2003). An economic model of moral motivation. Journal of Public Economics, 87(9-10), 1967–1983 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00222-5

Brock, J. M. (2020). Unfair inequality, governance and individual beliefs. Journal of Comparative Economics, 48(3), 658–687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2020.03.001

Bullock, H. E. (1999). Attributions for poverty: A comparison of middle-class and welfare recipients attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(10), 2059–2082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb02295.x

Bullock, H. E., Williams, W. R., Limbert, W. M. (2003). Predicting support for welfare policies: The impact of attributions and beliefs about inequality. Journal of Poverty, 7(3), 35–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J134v07n03_03

Burgoyne, C. B., Routh, D. A., Sidorenko-Stephenson, S. (1999). Perceptions, attributions and policy in the economic domain: A theoretical and comparative analysis. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 40(1), 79–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002071529904000105

Burstein, A., Vogel, J. (2017). International Trade, Technology, and the Skill Premium, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 125(5), 1356–1412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/693373

Björklund, A., and Waldenström, D. (2021). Facts and myths in the popular debate about inequality in Sweden (No. 1392). IFN Working Paper.

Charness, G., Dufwenberg, M. (2006). Promises and partnership. Econometrica, 74(6), 1579–1601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00719.x

Chrisendo, D., Niva, V., Hoffmann, R. et al. Rising income inequality across half of global population and socioecological implications. Nat Sustain 8, 1601-1613 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01689-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01689-4

Cohen-Goldner, S., Paserman, M.D. (2011). The dynamic impact of immigration on natives’ labor market outcomes: Evidence from Israel. European Economic Review, vol. 55(8), pp. 1027–1045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2011.05.002

Croson, R., Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic literature, 47(2), 448–474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.448

Desjonqueres, T., Machin, S., Van Reenen, J. (1999). Another Nail in the Coffin? Or can the Trade Based Explanation of Changing Skill Structures be Resurrected?, Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 101, 533–554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.00172

Di Bartolomeo, G., Dufwenberg, M., Papa, S., Razzolini, L. (2024). Guilt aversion and moral commitment: Eve versus Adam. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4380485

Dmick, M., Rueda, D., & Stegmueller, D. (2017). The altruistic rich? Inequality and other regarding preferences for redistribution. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 11(4), 385–439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00015099

Duncan, G. J., and Magnuson, K. (2012). Socioeconomic status and cognitive functioning: Moving from correlation to causation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(3), 377–386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1176

Eisenberg, N., and Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 91–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91

Erol, K. O. (2022). TURKMOD: Developing a tax and benefit microsimulation model for Turkey (No. CeMPA WP 1/22). CeMPA Working Paper Series.

Feagin, J. R. (1972). Poverty: We still believe that God helps those who help themselves. Psychology Today, 6(6), 101–129.

Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2586885 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151

Fong, C. (2001). Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 82, 225–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00141-9

Gimpelson, V., and Treisman, D. (2018). Misperceiving inequality. Economics and Politics, 30(1), 27–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12103

Guzzardi, D., Palagi, E., Roventini, A., Santoro, A. (2024). Reconstructing Income Inequality in Italy: New Evidence and Tax System Implications from Distributional National Accounts, Journal of the European Economic Association, Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 2180–2224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvad073

Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814

Hasenfeld, Y., Rafferty, J. A. (1989). The determinants of public attitudes toward the welfare state. Social Forces, 67(4), 1027–1048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2579713

Haskel, J., Heden, Y. (1999). Computers and the demand for skilled labour: industry-and establishment-level panel evidence for the UK. The Economic Journal, 109(454), 68–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00417

Hunt, M., Bullock, H. E. (2016). Ideologies and Beliefs about Poverty. In D. Brady and L. M. Burton (Eds.), The oxford handbook of the social science of poverty (pp. 93–116). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199914050.013.6

Husz, I., Kopasz, M., Medgyesi, M. (2022). Social workers’ causal attributions for poverty: Does the level of spatial concentration of disadvantages matter?. Social Indicators Research, 162(3), 10691091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02868-4

Iacono, R., Ranaldi, M. (2021). The nexus between perceptions of inequality and preferences for redistribution. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 19(1), 97–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-020-09470-7

Kangas, O. E. (2003). The grasshopper and the ants: Popular opinions of just distribution in Australia and Finland. Journal of Socio-Economics, 31(6), 721–743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-5357(02)00143-9

Kenworthy, L., & McCall, L. (2008). Inequality, public opinion and redistribution. Socio-Economic Review, 6(1), 35–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwm006

Jenkins, S. P. (2015). World income inequality databases: an assessment of WIID and SWIID. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 13, 629–671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-015-9305-3

Jensen, C., Petersen, M. B. (2017). The deservingness heuristic and the politics of health care. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 68–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12251

Kluegel, J. R., Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be. Aldine de Gruyter.

Larsen, C. A. (2006). The institutional logic of welfare attitudes. How welfare regimes influence public support. Ashgate. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006295234

Loewenstein, G. (2005). Hot-cold empathy gaps and medical decision making. Health psychology, 24(4S), S49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S49

Manski, C. F., and Molinari, F. (2010). Rounding probabilistic expectations in surveys. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 28(2), 219–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/jbes.2009.08098

Mantovani, D. (2017). Comparing redistributive efficiency of tax-benefit systems in Europe. DEMB WORKING PAPER SERIES.

Marquis, L., Rosset, J. (2021). When Explanations for Poverty Help Explain Social Policy Preferences: The Case of European Public Opinion Amidst the Economic Recession (2009-2014). Soc Just Res 34, 428–459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-021-00381-0

Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of political Economy, 89(5), 914–927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261013

Merolla, D. M., Hunt, M. O., Serpe, R. T. (2011). Concentrated disadvantage and beliefs about the causes of poverty: A multi-level analysis. Sociological Perspectives, 54(2), 205–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2011.54.2.205

OECD (2008). Annual Report 2008. OECD. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/journal_dev-v9-2-en

OECD (2018). The Role and Design of NetWealth Taxes in the OECD, OECD Tax Policy Studies, No. 26, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Oster, E. (2019). Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 37(2), 187–204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2016.1227711

Oxfam (2023). Annual Report 2023. Oxfam American Inc.

Oxfam. (2025a). Takers, not makers: The unjust poverty and unearned wealth of colonial inheritance. Oxfam International. https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/takers-not-makers-unjust-poverty-and-unearned-wealth-colonialism

Oxfam. (2025b). Billionaire wealth surges three times faster in 2024. Oxfam GB. https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/billionaire-wealth-surges-2-trillion-2024-three-times-faster-year-while-number

Pew Research Center. (2016). A wider ideological gap between more and less educated adults. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2016/04/26/a-wider-ideological-gap-between-more-and-less-educated-adults

Piketty, T., Saez, E., Zucman, G. (2022). Rethinking Capital and Wealth Taxation, Oxford Review of Economic Policy special issue "Taxing the Rich (More)". DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grad026

Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation. Foreword by Robert M. MacIver. New York: Farrar and Rinehart. Revised eds.

Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Beacon press.

Qureshi, F. H., Khawaja, S,estanovic, A. (2023). Ranking, Income Diversification, and Income Size–Are They Related?. Educational research: theory and practice, 34(3), 60–72.

Reyes, G., and Gasparini, L. (2022). Are fairness perceptions shaped by income inequality? Evidence from Latin America. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 20(4), 893–913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-022-09526-w

Roser, M., and Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2013). Income inequality. Our World in Data.

Saez, E., Zucman, G. (2019). Progressive Wealth Taxation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Fall 2019, pp. 437–533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2019.0017

Saez, E., Zucman, G. (2022). Wealth Taxation: Lessons from History and Recent Developments. AEA Papers and Proceedings 2022, 112, pp. 58–62, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20221055

Salverda, W., and Haas, C. (2014). Earnings, employment, and income inequality. Changing inequalities in rich countries: Analytical and comparative perspectives, 49–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687435.003.0003

Scheuer F., Slemrod J. (2021). Taxing Our Wealth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vo. 35, No. 1, pp. 207–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.1.207

Schneider, S. M., Castillo, J. C. (2015). Poverty attributions and the perceived justice of income inequality: A comparison of East and West Germany. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78(3), 263–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272515589298

Schulz, J., Mayerhoffer, D. M., and Gebhard, A. (2022). A network-based explanation of inequality perceptions. Social Networks, 70, 306–324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2022.02.007

Sirovátka, T., van Oorschot, W., Rabuic, L. (2002). Welfare state solidarity and support: The Czech republic compared with the Netherlands. In T. Peter and G. David (Eds.), World poverty: New policies to defeat an old enemy (pp. 147–169). The Policy Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56687/9781847425560-009

Solt, F. (2008). Economic inequality and democratic political engagement. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 48–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00298.x

Stephenson, S. (2000). Public beliefs in the causes of wealth and poverty and legitimization of inequalities in Russia and Estonia. Social Justice Research, 13(2), 83–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007541722131

Svallfors, S. (2003). Welfare regimes and welfare opinions: A comparison of eight western countries. Social Indicators Research, 64, 495–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025931414917

Tagler, M. J., Cozzarelli, C. (2013). Feelings toward the poor and beliefs about the causes of poverty: The role of affective-cognitive consistency in help-giving. Journal of Psychology, 147(6), 517–539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2012.718721

Van Oorschot, W., Roosma, F., Meuleman, B., Reeskens, T. (Eds.). (2017). The social legitimacy of targeted welfare: Attitudes to welfare deservingness. Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785367212

Visco, V. (2019). Promemoria per una Riforma Fiscale, Politica Economica, vol. XXXV (1), aprile, pp.131–154.

UN (2024). World social report 2024: Social development in times of convergence and divergence. United Nations Report

https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/world-social-report2024/

Wilkinson, R., and Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen Lane.

Williams, R., 2006. "Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 6(1), pages 58–82, March. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0600600104

World Bank (2023). Poverty and shared prosperity 2022: Correcting course. World Bank.https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/poverty-and-shared-prosperity

Published

2026-06-27

How to Cite

Becchetti, L., Cerase, G., & Solferino, N. (2026). Income Inequality and Pro-Poor Opinions: Empirical Evidence at Regional Level. Journal of Income Distribution®. https://doi.org/10.25071/1874-6322.40642

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.